View Full Version : Static Websites vs. Dynamic Websites

08-27-2010, 02:12 AM
Static Websites: -
A Web site that is static can only supply information that is written into the HTML and this information will not change unless the change is written into the source code. When a Web browser requests the specific static Web page, a server returns the page to the browser and the user only gets whatever information is contained in the HTML code.
Dynamic Websites:-
Dynamic websites contain Web pages that are generated in real-time. These pages include Web scripting code, such as PHP, Java or ASP. When a dynamic page is accessed, the code within the page is parsed on the Web server and the resulting HTML is sent to the client's Web browser.
Dynamic websites includes CMS Websites like Joomla Websites. CMS based websites are easier to maintain than static websites. This is because static pages each contain unique content, meaning they must be manually opened, edited, and published whenever a change is made. Dynamic pages, on the other hand, access information from a database. Therefore, to alter the content of a dynamic page, the webmaster may only need to update a database record. This is especially helpful for large sites that contain hundreds or thousands of pages. It also makes it possible for multiple users to update the content of a website without editing the layout of the pages.

08-27-2010, 04:30 AM
Nice topics. Thanks for sharing

08-27-2010, 06:37 AM
When it comes to promoting the websites professionally using the SEO services, websites would be actually like each other but static pages as you may guess would be having better chances to get indexed by the search engines pages faster.

09-02-2010, 02:04 AM
There are many static websites on the Internet, you won’t be able to tell immediately if it is static, but the chances are, if the site looks basic and is for a smaller company, and simply delivers information without any bells and whistles, it could be a static website. Static websites can only really be updated by someone with a knowledge of website development. Static websites are the cheapest to develop and host, and many smaller companies still use these to get a web presence.

Manchester United Hotel (http://www.manchester-hotels.uk.com/manchester-united-hotels.php)
Manchester Airport Hotels (http://www.manchester-hotels.uk.com/manchester-airport-hotels.php)

09-03-2010, 11:14 AM
Static websites will be better for SEO.
Google does not recognize dynamic pages, so avoid those for SEO purposes.

06-08-2011, 12:08 PM
Thanks for the information provided.