What is better VPS or dedicated server?

[~ServerPoint~]

I'm sure that the choice between dedicated server and VPS is the question of the size. If you need more you need to go with dedicated server and if you need less. VPS that is the way to save your money

[arslan220]

i think dedicated server is better.

[Hosting India]

VPS and Dedicated is only the choice that counts, it all depends upon the needs of the website owner and the budget. Dedicated is always the best choice if your hosting requirements are more, after that if you cant afford dedicated hosting, VPS is right choice for you

[~ServerPoint~]

Dedicated server will not allow you be flexible with moving

[HL-Sean]

VPS would be a good solution until you have enough money for a beefy dedicated server. Dont waste your time on those cheap P4 dedicated servers, its a waste of energy and space.

[Mark Kate]

The difference between vps and dedicated is that with dedicated you are the only person with files on the server. VPS is a virtualization environment where everyone gets root access inside a virtual machine, but there are multiple people with these VMs on one given physical server. If you are comfortable managing your sites in a VPS as root, then it won't be any more difficult to manage them on a dedicated server.

Dedicated Servers | Virtual Private Server Hosting

[om2580]

you must check their reviews section you will get better idea about their service and support

[lisaherry]

We will give you a lower price, or even provide you with a month of FREE service, if we don't succeed to fulfill our assurance. Simply just check out the facts.

[harry26]

The most important thing is that VPS is still shared with other people, so its speed will greatly depend on what other people are doing with it.

[bagful_webhost]

I had written an article on it, both have their own features. see here http://www.bagful.net/vps-and-dedicated-server.html

[sanamgupta]

1. with dedicated hosting, you have full control of the physical server, and complete access to all its resources. but with virtual private server, you control a virtualized machine on a server that may host several other virtual environments.
2. with VPS hosting, you share the CPU with other virtual machines, and have dedicated access to whatever RAM and storage resources have been assigned to you by the hosting company. It is cost effective and grows with your needs. Fast/Easy migration that means move your VPS to another VPS server quickly and easily.
3. With Dedicated Server hosting, since you aren't sharing resources with other customers, you normally have access to more computing power than you do with VPS hosting. It is powerful and 100% dedicated resources. No shared hardware, full control over the hardware and software components.

[jacobwallace]

obviously dedicated server is better than vps.

[jamespetervk]

You have written a very nice post

[manoharparakh]

Small and medium businesses, developers and mid-sized news outlets with minimal programs can see benefits with VPS hosting. If your business is 3 to 4 years old, it would have pulled in satisfying traffic and it requires additional resources to maintain. That is where VPS hosting plays a vital role. But if you opt for an unmanaged VPS hosting, then it may complicate your website set up and configuration with delay in time.

If you are a large enterprise handling different businesses and possess multiple websites, then without a second thought, you can acquire a dedicated server. Similarly, it is recommended for large eCommerce and media outlets as well. You get A-Z access to the server and its resources so that customizing space as per business need becomes easy. You get immense support all the time from hosting service providers since you invest huge money in it.

[jerryperes]

While VPS hosting is generally very secure, dedicated hosting offers a higher level of protection. Both types of hosting allow you to install your own security software, but with dedicated hosting, you are in full control of any security breaches.