Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    81

    Which one is good for SEO static or dynamic site?

    Which one is good for SEO static or dynamic site?

  2. #2
    Senior Member dennis123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    3,627
    static is going to be far stronger because search engines assume that there could be a possibility that dynamically generated information can be altered based on the search. Static links don’t have that capability and therefore carry an assumed level of trust that the info isn’t being altered to trick the spiders.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Noida
    Posts
    15
    Statics site is good for SEO trough statics website you can achive good ranking on your website and get high traffic on your website.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Nagpur India
    Posts
    611
    Static or dynamic site both are good but I like to suggest Static website is best for SEO.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    233
    static website is best for SEO purpose because it is very fast website there are no any database or server help

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    642
    I think SEO point of view static website is best.

  7. #7
    It does not matter regarding to SEO whether a web site is a dynamic or static.

    However, there are some caveats that you have to consider.

    URL-You have to make sure all of the URLs are user-friendly.

    Loading speed- It does not necessarily mean all of dynamic web sites are slower than static ones. But you have to make sure that the loading speed of your web site is as quick as possible. FYI, Google recently stated openly that they will put loading speed into consideration.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    5
    Google's got a blog post out today (and SELand covers it) about how they now recommend that webmasters and site owners DO NOT rewrite their ugly dynamic URLs to be clean and static. What's the reasoning behind this?

    We've come across many webmasters who, like our friend, believed that static or static-looking URLs were an advantage for indexing and ranking their sites. This is based on the presumption that search engines have issues with crawling and analyzing URLs that include session IDs or source trackers. However, as a matter of fact, we at Google have made some progress in both areas. While static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates because users can easily read the urls, the decision to use database-driven websites does not imply a significant disadvantage in terms of indexing and ranking. Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.

    The fundamental problem here is that Google is thinking about this from a completely different perspective as marketers. It's not that they're wrong or lying or creating misinformation, it's just that they're looking out for their best interests - effectively and efficiently crawling the web and serving up accurate data about the contents of pages. When URL rewrites go awry, it can screw up Google's ability to return the results their users want (and as content publishers, the results you want).

    However, the fact that some developers incorrectly create rewrite rules does not mean that sticking with dynamic parameters is now the "best practice." It simply means you have to do it right.

    Let's go over the list of pros and cons for static vs. dynamic URLs and see what's really changed:

    Pros of Dynamic URLs

    Umm... they're usually longer?
    Google (1 of the 4 major search engines) says they can effectively crawl and index them
    Cons of Dynamic URLs

    Lower click-through rate in the search results, in emails, and on forums/blogs where they're cut and pasted
    A greater chance of cutting off the end of the URL, resulting in a 404 or other error when copying/pasting
    Lower keyword relevance and keyword prominence
    Nearly impossible to write down manually and share on a business card or read over the phone to a person
    Challenging (if not impossible) to manually remember
    Does not typically create an accurate expectation of what the user will see prior to reaching the page
    Not usable in branding or print campaigns
    Won't typically carry optimized anchor text when used as the link text (which happens frequently due to copying & pasting)
    Pros of Static URLs (mostly the opposites of the above)

    Higher click-through rates in the SERPs, emails, web pages, etc.
    Higher keyword prominence and relevancy
    Easier to copy, paste and share on or offline
    Easy to remember and thus, usable in branding and offline media
    Creates an accurate expectation from users of what they're about to see on the page
    Can be made to contain good anchor text to help the page rank higher when linked-to directly in URL format
    All 4 of the major search engines (and plenty of minor engines) generally handle static URLs more easily than dynamic ones, particularly if there are multiple parameters
    Cons of Statics URLs

    You might mess up the rewriting process, in which case your users and search engines will struggle to find content properly on your site.
    So - bottom line - dynamic URLs don't afford you the same opportunity for search engine rankings, usability or portability that rewritten, keyword-optimized URLs do. Just because one of the engines doesn't have trouble crawling them doesn't mean it's any less critical to continue optimizing this element of a site's structure.

    If you buy into Google's argument that because rewriting URLs can occassionally cause problems (nevermind that we've done it at SEOmoz and with our clients dozens of times without issues), you're setting yourself up for something significantly less than search engine "optimization." I'd be tempted to call it conservative SEO, but it's not really even that. It's the mindset that living in fear of change rather than pursuing the best course of action is the better choice, and none of us who do SEO for a living should support that mentality.

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Registered User kabbomoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Dhaka
    Posts
    1
    A visitor to the organization and will play a pivotal role in the promotion of business websites. Therefore, based on the quality of the product you will be able to create interesting posts so you can create targeted customer interest in the product.

  11. #11
    static website rank work faster in SEO rather than dynamic website.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    38
    When it come to SEO, static websites has been always the best choice when compared to dynamic websites. Because, most search engines include Google won't prefer dynamic url's when compared to static url's.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

  Find Web Hosting      
  Shared Web Hosting UNIX & Linux Web Hosting Windows Web Hosting Adult Web Hosting
  ASP ASP.NET Web Hosting Reseller Web Hosting VPS Web Hosting Managed Web Hosting
  Cloud Web Hosting Dedicated Server E-commerce Web Hosting Cheap Web Hosting


Premium Partners:


Visit forums.thewebhostbiz.com: to discuss the web hosting business, buy and sell websites and domain names, and discuss current web hosting tools and software.