With so many websites offering computer-generated NBA predictions, I've been wondering how they compare to traditional basketball analysis.
Statistical models can process huge amounts of historical data, but experienced analysts may notice things that aren't always reflected in the numbers, such as player motivation, team chemistry, and coaching adjustments.
Personally, I think combining both approaches makes the most sense, but I'm interested in hearing other opinions.
Has anyone compared computer predictions with expert picks over an entire NBA season? Which approach produced more consistent results?



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks